Friday, 18 September 2015

Sensors and Sensing Systems

The theme covers the range from individual sensor research and development to the operation and functioning of entire sensing systems.
Examples of research areas include
  • fundamental and applied research into advanced sensor materials, devices and systems
  • atmospheric propagation of electromagnetic radiation
  • ocean glider sensing systems
  • sensor networks
  • chemical/biological sensors for applications in:
    • defence
    • security
    • precision agriculture
    • forensic science
    • remote sensing
    • food and water security
    • and biomedical diagnostics

Artificial Intelligence

In the early days of computing it was often stated that computers could never exhibit “intelligence” because they could only carry out tasks that their programmers had anticipated and pre-programmed solutions for. 
Advances in areas such as Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Evolutionary Computation, Neural Networks, Data Mining and Automated Reasoning have shown that computers are capable of far more. 

Current projects

  • Computational Intelligence Techniques for Optimisation, Modelling and Control
  • Applications of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms
  • Evolutionary optimisation and design
  • Hypervolume calculation for multi-objective optimisation
  • Evolutionary learning and games
  • Smart Home for Successful Aging Flexible Technologies for aging independently and knowledgeably
  • Agent and Web Services
  • Agent Autonomy for AIBO Entertainment Robot
  • Ontology Learning and Discovery using Corpus Analysis
  • Trust and Social Network Analysis.

Research groups

Adaptive System

The Adaptive System Research Group (ASRG) researches and develops computational systems that are able to adapt to or learn from the data, knowledge or environment in which they are working.  These systems typically mimic processes found in nature.  We seek to develop computational systems that employ evolutionary, learning, optimisation and modelling techniques to solve or improve performance on complex problems.

Walking Fish Group

Many problems faced by companies are impractical to solve by traditional analytical methods. Such problems may be computationally intractable, or may involve highly non-linear, complex systems. These difficulties offer no impediment to evolutionary algorithms. The Walking Fish Group focuses on such systems, their algorithms and the suitability of the proposed solutions. 

Multi-Agent Systems

As the name suggests, multi-agent systems are made up of multiple single agents.  This allows them to provide solutions to problems that are inherently too complex or impractical for single agent systems.

Business Research Methods - HRMG343 (2016)

HRMG343 - 16B (HAM)

20.0 Points

An introduction to gathering, analysing and reporting data when conducting research in organisations.
Prerequisite(s): HRMG241 or at the discretion of the Chairperson of Department
Internal assessment/examination ratio: 1:0

Timetabled Lectures

DayStartEndRoom
Mon1:00 PM3:00 PMMS4.G.01
Wed2:00 PM4:00 PMTC.4.13
NB:There may be other timetabled events for this paper such as tutorials or workshops.
 Visit the online timetable for HRMG343 for more details

Indicative Fees

Fees for 2016 are not yet available.
Paper Details current as of: 11 September 2015 4:10pm
Indicative Fees current as of: 18 September 2015 4:30am

Strategy for Enterprise - STMG285 (2016)

STMG285 - 16A (HAM)

20.0 Points

This course focuses on growth strategies for emerging enterprises and the particular challenges of family businesses.
Prerequisite(s): STMG191
Restriction(s): STMG385
Internal assessment/examination ratio: 1:0

Timetabled Lectures

DayStartEndRoom
Tue12:00 PM2:00 PMA.G.30
Thu12:00 PM2:00 PMA.G.30
NB:There may be other timetabled events for this paper such as tutorials or workshops.
 Visit the online timetable for STMG285 for more details

Indicative Fees

Fees for 2016 are not yet available.
Available Subjects:   | Entrepreneurship | Strategic Management | 
Paper Details current as of: 11 September 2015 4:10pm
Indicative Fees current as of: 18 September 2015 4:30am

Strategies for People, Planet and Profit - STMG244 (2016)

STMG244

20.0 Points

This paper will not be taught in 2016.

Timetabled Lectures

There are no timetabled lectures for STMG244.
NB:There may be other timetabled events for this paper such as tutorials or workshops.
 Visit the online timetable for STMG244 for more details

Indicative Fees

Fees for 2016 are not yet available.
Available Subjects:   | Entrepreneurship | Strategic Management | 
Paper Details current as of: 11 September 2015 4:10pm
Indicative Fees current as of: 18 September 2015 4:30am

Net Ready: Navigating the Competitive Landscape - STMG222 (2016)

STMG222 - 16S (NET)

20.0 Points

A web-based study of management in action.
Internal assessment/examination ratio: 1:0

Timetabled Lectures

There are no timetabled lectures for STMG222.
NB:There may be other timetabled events for this paper such as tutorials or workshops.
 Visit the online timetable for STMG222 for more details

Indicative Fees

Fees for 2016 are not yet available.
Available Subjects:   | Entrepreneurship | Strategic Management | 
Paper Details current as of: 11 September 2015 4:10pm
Indicative Fees current as of: 18 September 2015 4:30am

The Entrepreneur - STMG192 (2016)

STMG192 - 16B (HAM)

15.0 Points

Entrepreneurs face many paradoxes in their endeavours and this paper will help you to examine the types, characteristics, skills and conditions that build successful entrepreneurs.
Internal assessment/examination ratio: 7:3

Timetabled Lectures

DayStartEndRoom
Tue2:00 PM4:00 PML.G.04
Thu1:00 PM3:00 PMMSB.1.05
NB:There may be other timetabled events for this paper such as tutorials or workshops.
 Visit the online timetable for STMG192 for more details

Indicative Fees

Fees for 2016 are not yet available.
Available Subjects:   | Entrepreneurship | Strategic Management | 
Paper Details current as of: 11 September 2015 4:10pm
Indicative Fees current as of: 18 September 2015 4:30am

Introduction to Management - STMG191 (2016)

STMG191 - 16A (HAM) & 16B (HAM)

15.0 Points

This paper provides an appreciation of management essentials and the role of managers in a contemporary context.
Internal assessment/examination ratio: 3:2
Note: Students without the required background in literacy may be directed to take MCOM104 before attempting STMG191.

Timetabled Lectures

DayStartEndRoom
STMG191-16A (HAM)
Wed11:00 AM1:00 PMPWC
STMG191-16B (HAM)
Mon12:00 PM2:00 PMPWC
NB:There may be other timetabled events for this paper such as tutorials or workshops.
 Visit the online timetable for STMG191 for more details

Indicative Fees

Fees for 2016 are not yet available.
Paper Details current as of: 11 September 2015 4:10pm
Indicative Fees current as of: 18 September 2015 4:30am

Vertical Integration

Definition

  1. Vertical integration is a strategy used by a company to gain control over its suppliers or distributors in order to increase the firm’s power in the marketplace, reduce transaction costs and secure supplies or distribution channels.”
  2. Forward integration is a strategy where a firm gains ownership or increased control over its previous customers (distributors or retailers).”
  3. Backward integration is a strategy where a firm gains ownership or increased control over its previous suppliers.”

What is vertical integration?

Vertical integration (VI) is a strategy that many companies use to gain control over their industry’s value chain. This strategy is one of the major considerations when developing corporate level strategy. The important question in corporate strategy is, whether the company should participate in one activity (one industry) or many activities (many industries) along the industry value chain. For example, the company has to decide if it only manufactures its products or would engage in retailing and after-sales services as well. Two issues have to be considered before integration:
  • Costs. An organization should vertically integrate when costs of making the product inside the company are lower than the costs of buying that product in the market.
  • Scope of the firm. A firm should consider whether moving into new industries would not dilute its current competencies. New activities in a company are also harder to manage and control. The answers to previous questions determine if a company will pursue none, partial or full VI.
The example below illustrates a general industry value chain and none, partial or full VI of a corporate operating in that industry.
Industry's value chain and three different levels of vertical integration a company can achieve: none, partial and full

Difference between vertical and horizontal integrations

VI is different from horizontal integration, where a corporate usually acquires or mergers with a competitor in a same industry. An example of horizontal integration would be a company competing in raw materials industry and buying another company in the same industry rather than trying to expand to intermediate goods industry. Horizontal integration examples: Kraft Foods taking over Cadbury, HP acquiring Compaq or Lenovo buying personal computer division from IBM.
Difference between vertical and horizontal integrations

Types of vertical integration

Firms can pursue forward, backward or balanced VI strategies.
Three types of vertical integration strategies a company can pursue: forward, backward and balanced

Forward integration

If the manufacturing company engages in sales or after-sales industries it pursues forward integrationstrategy. This strategy is implemented when the company wants to achieve higher economies of scale and larger market share. Forward integration strategy became very popular with increasing internet appearance. Many manufacturing companies have built their online stores and started selling their products directly to consumers, bypassing retailers. Forward integration strategy is effective when:
  • Few quality distributors are available in the industry.
  • Distributors or retailers have high profit margins.
  • Distributors are very expensive, unreliable or unable to meet firm’s distribution needs.
  • The industry is expected to grow significantly.
  • There are benefits of stable production and distribution.
  • The company has enough resources and capabilities to manage the new business.

Backward integration

When the same manufacturing company starts making intermediate goods for itself or takes over its previous suppliers, it pursues backward integration strategy. Firms implement backward integration strategy in order to secure stable input of resources and become more efficient. Backward integration strategy is most beneficial when:
  • Firm’s current suppliers are unreliable, expensive or cannot supply the required inputs.
  • There are only few small suppliers but many competitors in the industry.
  • The industry is expanding rapidly.
  • The prices of inputs are unstable.
  • Suppliers earn high profit margins.
  • A company has necessary resources and capabilities to manage the new business.
Balanced integration strategy is simply a combination of forward and backward integrations.

Vertical integration examples

Smartphones Industry

Smartphones industry

Automotive Industry

Automotive industry

Oil Industry

Oil industry

Media Industry

Media industry

Advantages

Advantages of the strategy:
  • Lower costs due to eliminated market transaction costs
  • Improved quality of supplies
  • Critical resources can be acquired through VI
  • Improved coordination in supply chain
  • Greater market share
  • Secured distribution channels
  • Facilitates investment in specialized assets (site, physical-assets and human-assets)
  • New competencies

Disadvantages

Disadvantages of VI:
  • Higher costs if the company is incapable to manage new activities efficiently
  • The ownership of supply and distribution channels may lead to lower quality products and reduced efficiency because of the lack of competition
  • Increased bureaucracy and higher investments leads to reduced flexibility
  • Higher potential for legal repercussion due to size (An organization may become a monopoly)
  • New competencies may clash with old ones and lead to competitive disadvantage

Alternatives to VI

This strategy may not always be the best choice for an organization due to a lack of sufficient resources that are needed to venture into a new industry. Sometimes the alternatives to VI offer more benefits. The available choices differ in the amount of investments required and the integration level. For example, short-term contracts require little integration and much less investments than joint ventures.

Vertical Integration Alternatives

Vertical integration alternatives listed (from least to most integrated): 1. Purchases in the market; 2. Short-term contracts; 3. Long-term contracts such as franchising and licensing; 4. Joint-Ventures.

Value Chain Analysis

Definition

  1. Value chain analysis (VCA) is a process where a firm identifies its primary and support activities that add value to its final product and then analyze these activities to reduce costs or increase differentiation.”
  2. Value chain represents the internal activities a firm engages in when transforming inputs into outputs.”

Understanding the tool

VCA is a strategy tool used to analyze internal firm activities. Its goal is to recognize, which activities are the most valuable (i.e. are the source of cost or differentiation advantage) to the firm and which ones could be improved to provide competitive advantage. In other words, by looking into internal activities, the analysis reveals where a firm’s competitive advantages or disadvantages are. The firm that competes through differentiation advantage will try to perform its activities better than competitors would do. If it competes through cost advantage, it will try to perform internal activities at lower costs than competitors would do. When a company is capable of producing goods at lower costs than the market price or to provide superior products, it earns profits.
M. Porter introduced the generic value chain model in 1985. Value chain represents all the internal activities a firm engages in to produce goods and services. VC is formed of primary activities that add value to the final product directly and support activities that add value indirectly. Below you can see the Porter’s VC model.
Primary Activities
Value Chain Model
Support Activities
Although, primary activities add value directly to the production process, they are not necessarily more important than support activities. Nowadays, competitive advantage mainly derives from technological improvements or innovations in business models or processes. Therefore, such support activities as ‘information systems’, ‘R&D’ or ‘general management’ are usually the most important source of differentiation advantage. On the other hand, primary activities are usually the source of cost advantage, where costs can be easily identified for each activity and properly managed.
Firm’s VC is a part of a larger industry VC. The more activities a company undertakes compared to industry VC, the more vertically integrated it is. Below you can find an industry value chain and its relation to a firm level VC.
Organization's Value Chain in relation to Industry VC

Using the tool

There are two different approaches on how to perform the analysis, which depend on what type ofcompetitive advantage a company wants to create (cost or differentiation advantage). The table below lists all the steps needed to achieve cost or differentiation advantage using VCA.
Cost advantageDifferentiation advantage
This approach is used when organizations try to compete on costs and want to understand the sources of their cost advantage or disadvantage and what factors drive those costs.The firms that strive to create superior products or services use differentiation advantage approach.
  • Step 1. Identify the firm’s primary and support activities.
  • Step 2. Establish the relative importance of each activity in the total cost of the product.
  • Step 3. Identify cost drivers for each activity.
  • Step 4. Identify links between activities.
  • Step 5. Identify opportunities for reducing costs.
  • Step 1. Identify the customers’ value-creating activities.
  • Step 2. Evaluate the differentiation strategies for improving customer value.
  • Step 3. Identify the best sustainable differentiation.

Cost advantage

To gain cost advantage a firm has to go through 5 analysis steps:
Step 1. Identify the firm’s primary and support activities. All the activities (from receiving and storing materials to marketing, selling and after sales support) that are undertaken to produce goods or services have to be clearly identified and separated from each other. This requires an adequate knowledge of company’s operations because value chain activities are not organized in the same way as the company itself. The managers who identify value chain activities have to look into how work is done to deliver customer value.
Step 2. Establish the relative importance of each activity in the total cost of the product. The total costs of producing a product or service must be broken down and assigned to each activity. Activity based costing is used to calculate costs for each process. Activities that are the major sources of cost or done inefficiently (when benchmarked against competitors) must be addressed first.
Step 3. Identify cost drivers for each activity. Only by understanding what factors drive the costs, managers can focus on improving them. Costs for labor-intensive activities will be driven by work hours, work speed, wage rate, etc. Different activities will have different cost drivers.
Step 4. Identify links between activities. Reduction of costs in one activity may lead to further cost reductions in subsequent activities. For example, fewer components in the product design may lead to less faulty parts and lower service costs. Therefore identifying the links between activities will lead to better understanding how cost improvements would affect he whole value chain. Sometimes, cost reductions in one activity lead to higher costs for other activities.
Step 5. Identify opportunities for reducing costs. When the company knows its inefficient activities and cost drivers, it can plan on how to improve them. Too high wage rates can be dealt with by increasing production speed, outsourcing jobs to low wage countries or installing more automated processes.

Differentiation advantage

VCA is done differently when a firm competes on differentiation rather than costs. This is because the source of differentiation advantage comes from creating superior products, adding more features and satisfying varying customer needs, which results in higher cost structure.
Step 1. Identify the customers’ value-creating activities. After identifying all value chain activities, managers have to focus on those activities that contribute the most to creating customer value. For example, Apple products’ success mainly comes not from great product features (other companies have high-quality offerings too) but from successful marketing activities.
Step 2. Evaluate the differentiation strategies for improving customer value. Managers can use the following strategies to increase product differentiation and customer value:
  • Add more product features;
  • Focus on customer service and responsiveness;
  • Increase customization;
  • Offer complementary products.
Step 3. Identify the best sustainable differentiation. Usually, superior differentiation and customer value will be the result of many interrelated activities and strategies used. The best combination of them should be used to pursue sustainable differentiation advantage.

Example

This example is partially adopted from R. M. Grant’s book ‘Contemporary Strategy Analysis’ p.241. It illustrates the basic VCA for an automobile manufacturing company that competes on cost advantage. This analysis doesn’t include support activities that are essential to any firm’s value chain, thus the analysis itself is not complete.
Step 1Value chain of an auto manufacturer.
Step 2$164 M
less important
$410 M
very important
$524 M
very important
$10 M
not important
$384 M
important
$230 M
less important
Step 3
  • Number and frequency of new models
  • Sales per model
  • Order size
  • Average value of purchases per supplier
  • Location of suppliers
  • Scale of plants
  • Capacity utilization
  • Location of plants
  • Level of quality targets
  • Frequency of defects
  • Size of advertising budget
  • Strength of existing reputation
  • Sales Volume
  • Number of dealers
  • Sales per dealer
  • Frequency of defects requiring repair recalls
Step 41. High-quality assembling process reduces defects and costs in quality control and dealer support activities.
2. Locating plants near the cluster of suppliers or dealers reduces purchasing and distribution costs.
3. Fewer model designs reduce assembling costs.
4. Higher order sizes increase warehousing costs.
Step 51. Create just one model design for different regions to cut costs in designing and engineering, to increase order sizes of the same materials, to simplify assembling and quality control processes and to lower marketing costs.
2. Manufacture components inside the company to eliminate transaction costs of buying them in the market and to optimize plant utilization. This would also lead to greater economies of scale.

Porter's Five Forces

Definition

  1. Porter’s five forces model is an analysis tool that uses five forces to determine the profitability of an industry and shape a firm’s competitive strategy”[1]
  2. “It is a framework that classifies and analyzes the most important forces affecting the intensity of competition in an industry and its profitability level.”

Understanding the tool

Five forces model was created by M. Porter in 1979 to understand how five key competitive forces are affecting an industry. The five forces identified are:
Model
These forces determine an industry structure and the level of competition in that industry. The stronger competitive forces in the industry are the less profitable it is. An industry with low barriers to enter, having few buyers and suppliers but many substitute products and competitors will be seen as very competitive and thus, not so attractive due to its low profitability.
Attractive-profitable and unattractive-unprofitable industries
It is every strategist’s job to evaluate company’s competitive position in the industry and to identify what strengths or weakness can be exploited to strengthen that position. The tool is very useful in formulating firm’s strategy as it reveals how powerful each of the five key forces is in a particular industry.
Threat of new entrants. This force determines how easy (or not) it is to enter a particular industry. If an industry is profitable and there are few barriers to enter, rivalry soon intensifies. When more organizations compete for the same market share, profits start to fall. It is essential for existing organizations to create high barriers to enter to deter new entrants. Threat of new entrants is high when:
  • Low amount of capital is required to enter a market;
  • Existing companies can do little to retaliate;
  • Existing firms do not possess patents, trademarks or do not have established brand reputation;
  • There is no government regulation;
  • Customer switching costs are low (it doesn’t cost a lot of money for a firm to switch to other industries);
  • There is low customer loyalty;
  • Products are nearly identical;
  • Economies of scale can be easily achieved.
Bargaining power of suppliers. Strong bargaining power allows suppliers to sell higher priced or low quality raw materials to their buyers. This directly affects the buying firms’ profits because it has to pay more for materials. Suppliers have strong bargaining power when:
  • There are few suppliers but many buyers;
  • Suppliers are large and threaten to forward integrate;
  • Few substitute raw materials exist;
  • Suppliers hold scarce resources;
  • Cost of switching raw materials is especially high.
Bargaining power of buyers. Buyers have the power to demand lower price or higher product quality from industry producers when their bargaining power is strong. Lower price means lower revenues for the producer, while higher quality products usually raise production costs. Both scenarios result in lower profits for producers. Buyers exert strong bargaining power when:
  • Buying in large quantities or control many access points to the final customer;
  • Only few buyers exist;
  • Switching costs to other supplier are low;
  • They threaten to backward integrate;
  • There are many substitutes;
  • Buyers are price sensitive.
Threat of substitutes. This force is especially threatening when buyers can easily find substitute products with attractive prices or better quality and when buyers can switch from one product or service to another with little cost. For example, to switch from coffee to tea doesn’t cost anything, unlike switching from car to bicycle.
Rivalry among existing competitors. This force is the major determinant on how competitive and profitable an industry is. In competitive industry, firms have to compete aggressively for a market share, which results in low profits. Rivalry among competitors is intense when:
  • There are many competitors;
  • Exit barriers are high;
  • Industry of growth is slow or negative;
  • Products are not differentiated and can be easily substituted;
  • Competitors are of equal size;
  • Low customer loyalty.
Although, Porter originally introduced five forces affecting an industry, scholars have suggested including the sixth force: complements. Complements increase the demand of the primary product with which they are used, thus, increasing firm’s and industry’s profit potential. For example, iTunes was created to complement iPod and added value for both products. As a result, both iTunes and iPod sales increased, increasing Apple’s profits.

Using the tool

We now understand that Porter’s five forces framework is used to analyze industry’s competitive forces and to shape organization’s strategy according to the results of the analysis. But how to use this tool? We have identified the following steps:
  • Step 1. Gather the information on each of the five forces
  • Step 2. Analyze the results and display them on a diagram
  • Step 3. Formulate strategies based on the conclusions
Step 1. Gather the information on each of the five forces. What managers should do during this step is to gather information about their industry and to check it against each of the factors (such as “number of competitors in the industry”) influencing the force. We have already identified the most important factors in the table below.
Threat of new entry
  • Amount of capital required
  • Retaliation by existing companies
  • Legal barriers (patents, copyrights, etc.)
  • Brand reputation
  • Product differentiation
  • Access to suppliers and distributors
  • Economies of scale
  • Sunk costs
  • Government regulation
Supplier power
  • Number of suppliers
  • Suppliers’ size
  • Ability to find substitute materials
  • Materials scarcity
  • Cost of switching to alternative materials
  • Threat of integrating forward
Buyer power
  • Number of buyers
  • Size of buyers
  • Size of each order
  • Buyers’ cost of switching suppliers
  • There are many substitutes
  • Price sensitivity
  • Threat of integrating backward
Threat of substitutes
  • Number of substitutes
  • Performance of substitutes
  • Cost of changing
Rivalry among existing competitors
  • Number of competitors
  • Cost of leaving an industry
  • Industry growth rate and size
  • Product differentiation
  • Competitors’ size
  • Customer loyalty
  • Threat of horizontal integration
  • Level of advertising expense
Step 2. Analyze the results and display them on a diagram. After gathering all the information, you should analyze it and determine how each force is affecting an industry. For example, if there are many companies of equal size operating in the slow growth industry, it means that rivalry between existing companies is strong. Remember that five forces affect different industries differently so don’t use the same results of analysis for even similar industries!
Step 3. Formulate strategies based on the conclusions. At this stage, managers should formulate firm’s strategies using the results of the analysis For example, if it is hard to achieve economies of scale in the market, the company should pursue cost leadership strategy. Product development strategy should be used if the current market growth is slow and the market is saturated.
Although, Porter’s five forces is a great tool to analyze industry’s structure and use the results to formulate firm’s strategy, it has its limitations and requires further analysis to be done, such as SWOT,PEST or Value Chain analysis.

Example

This is Porter’s five forces analysis example for an automotive industry.
Example of Porter's five forces
Threat of new entry (very weak)
  • Large amount of capital required
  • High retaliation possible from existing companies, if new entrants would bring innovative products and ideas to the industry
  • Few legal barriers protect existing companies from new entrants
  • All automotive companies have established brand image and reputation
  • Products are mainly differentiated by design and engineering quality
  • New entrant could easily access suppliers and distributors
  • A firm has to produce at least 5 million (by some estimations) vehicles to be cost competitive, therefore it is very hard to achieve economies of scale
  • Governments often protect their home markets by introducing high import taxes
Supplier power (weak)
  • Large number of suppliers
  • Some suppliers are large but the most of them are pretty small
  • Companies use another type of material (use one metal instead of another) but only to some extent (plastic instead of metal)
  • Materials widely accessible
  • Suppliers do not pose any threat of forward integration
Buyer power (strong)
  • There are many buyers
  • Most of the buyers are individuals that buy one car, but corporates or governments usually buy large fleets and can bargain for lower prices
  • It doesn’t cost much for buyers to switch to another brand of vehicle or to start using other type of transportation
  • Buyers can easily choose alternative car brand
  • Buyers are price sensitive and their decision is often based on how much does a vehicle cost
  • Buyers do not threaten backward integration
Threat of substitutes (weak)
  • There are many alternative types of transportation, such as bicycles, motorcycles, trains, buses or planes
  • Substitutes can rarely offer the same convenience
  • Alternative types of transportation almost always cost less and sometimes are more environment friendly
Competitive rivalry (very strong)
  • Moderate number of competitors
  • If a firm would decide to leave an industry it would incur huge losses, so most of the time it either bankrupts or stays in automotive industry for the lifetime
  • Industry is very large but matured
  • Size of competing firm’s vary but they usually compete for different consumer segments
  • Customers are loyal to their brands
  • There is moderate threat of being acquired by a competitor